Pupil premium strategy statement 2026-27
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
|
Detail |
Data |
|
School name |
Windy Nook Primary |
|
Number of pupils in school |
296 |
|
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils |
28% including nursery |
|
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) |
2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 |
|
Date this statement was published |
October 2026 |
|
Date on which it will be reviewed |
September 2027 |
|
Statement authorised by |
Mrs. Lucie Forrest |
|
Pupil premium lead |
Mrs. Jemma Traynor |
|
Governor / Trustee lead |
Mrs. Lynne Coulson |
Funding overview
|
Detail |
Amount |
|
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year |
£149,240 |
|
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year |
£0 |
|
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) |
£0 |
|
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year |
£149,240 based on 84 FSM, 4 Post Lac and 3 Service |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
|
At Windy Nook Primary School, we believe that all pupils, regardless of background or circumstance, should achieve highly and have access to the same opportunities, experiences and aspirations as their peers. Our pupil premium strategy is centred on identifying and removing barriers to learning so that disadvantaged pupils can achieve their full potential academically, socially and emotionally. Analysis of outcomes from 2025/26 shows that disadvantaged pupils continue to achieve well in some areas, particularly Communication and Language in EYFS, writing at KS2 and participation in enrichment opportunities. However, significant gaps remain in phonics, KS1 attainment and attendance, particularly for disadvantaged pupils who also have SEND or additional vulnerabilities. Our approach is informed by the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) guidance, which highlights high-quality teaching as the most effective way to improve outcomes for disadvantaged pupils. Our strategy focuses on:
Many of our disadvantaged pupils experience multiple barriers to learning, including SEND, attendance difficulties, social care involvement, trauma and language acquisition needs. Our strategy therefore combines universal provision with targeted support to meet individual needs and ensure pupils are supported to achieve their potential. Funding decisions are reviewed throughout the year and adapted where evidence shows greater impact can be achieved.
|
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
|
Challenge number |
Detail of challenge |
|
1 |
Assessments, observations and discussions indicate that many disadvantaged pupils enter school with lower levels of communication, language and vocabulary than their peers. These gaps continue to impact reading, writing and wider curriculum attainment |
|
2 |
Attendance for disadvantaged pupils remains below that of non-disadvantaged pupils. Persistent absence continues to have a negative impact on achievement and engagement. |
|
3 |
Phonics and early reading outcomes remain lower for disadvantaged pupils. In 2025/26, 50% of disadvantaged pupils met the expected standard in the Year 1 Phonics Screening Check compared with 77.5% of non-disadvantaged pupils. |
|
4 |
KS1 outcomes indicate that disadvantaged pupils require earlier intervention and more rapid support in reading, writing and mathematics to prevent gaps becoming embedded. |
|
5 |
A higher proportion of disadvantaged pupils also have SEND and require additional adaptations and support to access the curriculum successfully.
|
|
6 |
Some disadvantaged pupils have limited access to enrichment opportunities and experiences beyond school, which can affect confidence, aspirations and cultural capital.
|
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
|
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
|
Improved communication, language and vocabulary development for disadvantaged pupils
|
The proportion of disadvantaged pupils achieving age-related expectations in Communication and Language by the end of EYFS increases. Disadvantaged pupils demonstrate improved vocabulary, communication and participation across the curriculum.
|
|
Improved attendance for disadvantaged pupils
|
Attendance of disadvantaged pupils improves, and the attendance gap narrows year on year. Persistent absence rates decrease year on year. |
|
Improved phonics and early reading attainment for disadvantaged pupils.
|
More disadvantaged pupils meet the expected standard in the Year 1 Phonics Screening Check. The attainment gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils is reduced. |
|
Improved attainment in reading, writing and mathematics, particularly in KS1.
|
More disadvantaged pupils achieve age-related expectations in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of KS1. Attainment gaps between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils reduce across year groups. |
|
Improved outcomes for disadvantaged pupils with SEND and additional vulnerabilities
|
Disadvantaged pupils with SEND make strong progress from their individual starting points. Improved attendance, engagement and attainment are evident through assessment information and personalised provision reviews. |
|
Improved access to enrichment and wider opportunities.
|
More disadvantaged pupils participate in clubs, educational visits, performances, sporting events or residential experiences. Financial barriers do not prevent participation in the wider life of the school. |
Progress towards these outcomes will be monitored termly through attainment data, attendance data, intervention reviews, pupil voice, book scrutiny, lesson visits and participation records, with actions adapted where necessary to maximise impact for disadvantaged pupils.
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £130,000
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Continued staff development in adaptive teaching, Rosenshine’s Principles, retrieval practice, metacognition and Kagan Cooperative Learning Structures. Staff will use carefully planned collaborative structures to increase engagement, pupil talk, participation and accountability in learning. |
The EEF states that high-quality teaching has the greatest impact on closing the disadvantage gap. Metacognition and self-regulation approaches can provide up to seven months additional progress. Collaborative learning approaches have been shown to deliver an average of five months additional progress when carefully structured and implemented. |
4, 5 |
|
Embed Voice 21 oracy approaches, Kagan Cooperative Learning Structures, explicit vocabulary instruction and reading fluency strategies across the curriculum.
|
Oral language interventions have an average impact of +6 months’ additional progress, with particularly positive outcomes for disadvantaged pupils. Structured talk, cooperative learning and explicit vocabulary teaching improve language development, engagement and comprehension. Reading fluency approaches, including echo reading, choral reading and repeated reading, support automaticity, confidence and understanding, enabling pupils to access the wider curriculum more successfully. |
1, 4, 5 |
|
Ongoing RWInc training, coaching and quality assurance to strengthen phonics teaching and early reading. |
Phonics approaches have a strong evidence base and are particularly effective for younger disadvantaged pupils. |
3
|
|
Writing professional development, moderation and curriculum refinement. |
High-quality teaching has the greatest impact on pupil attainment. The EEF identifies effective professional development as a key mechanism for improving teaching quality and pupil outcomes, particularly for disadvantaged pupils. |
4, 5
|
|
Further development of adaptive teaching strategies for disadvantaged pupils with SEND. |
The EEF identifies scaffolding, explicit instruction and diagnostic assessment as important elements of high-quality teaching. Responsive teaching and effective scaffolding improve access to the curriculum, support pupils to overcome barriers to learning and contribute to improved outcomes, particularly for disadvantaged pupils.
|
5 |
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £15,000
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Early phonics intervention and close monitoring of pupils at risk of not meeting the expected standard. Reviews of the lowest-attaining readers, including decoding accuracy, fluency and application of phonics knowledge. |
Small-group phonics intervention is most effective when delivered consistently and targeted to specific need. Regular assessment ensures provision remains responsive and effective. |
3 |
|
Reading fluency and comprehension interventions across KS1 and KS2. |
Reading comprehension strategies (+6 months) and small-group tuition (+4 months) are high-impact, cost-effective approaches according to the EEF. Developing reading fluency through regular, structured practice improves accuracy, automaticity and comprehension, helping disadvantaged pupils access the wider curriculum more successfully.
|
3, 4 |
|
Vocabulary, language and communication interventions, including Talk Boost and EAL support. |
Phonics approaches have a strong evidence base, particularly for disadvantaged pupils. Reading fluency interventions improve accuracy, automaticity and comprehension, while EMTASS support enhances language acquisition and curriculum access for EAL learners. Reading comprehension strategies have an average impact of +6 months’ additional progress according to the EEF. Together, these approaches improve reading outcomes across the curriculum
|
1 |
|
Mathematics intervention and Mastering Number approaches across school. |
Evidence from NCETM and the EEF demonstrates improvements in fluency, confidence and mathematical understanding. |
4 |
|
Structured intervention programmes for disadvantaged pupils with SEND and additional vulnerabilities. |
Diagnostic assessment and personalised support improve outcomes where barriers are clearly identified. |
5 |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £5240
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Continued Family Support Worker provision, attendance support and family engagement. |
DfE guidance highlights the strong link between attendance and educational outcomes. Building positive relationships with families improves engagement and attendance. |
2, 5 |
|
Attendance monitoring and targeted support for persistent absentees. |
DfE guidance highlights the strong link between attendance and attainment, with persistent absence negatively affecting outcomes. Improving attendance increases access to high-quality teaching, targeted interventions and wider school opportunities, helping disadvantaged pupils achieve better outcomes. |
2 |
|
Financial support for educational visits, residentials, clubs and enrichment opportunities. |
The DfE identifies cultural capital as essential preparation for future success. Wider enrichment opportunities help broaden horizons, build confidence, increase engagement and raise aspirations, particularly for disadvantaged pupils who may have fewer opportunities outside school |
6 |
|
SEMH support, trauma-informed, nurture support and access to external services where required. |
EEF evidence shows that social and emotional learning approaches can provide +3 months’ additional progress. Effective social and emotional support improves wellbeing, self-regulation, engagement and readiness to learn, helping disadvantaged pupils to achieve better academic outcomes. EEF evidence shows that social and emotional learning approaches can provide +3 months’ additional progress. Trauma-informed and nurture approaches support emotional regulation, wellbeing and engagement, helping pupils with SEMH needs to access learning and achieve positive outcomes
|
5 |
|
Contingency support for families facing acute barriers |
Enables rapid and effective response to emerging needs and ensures pupils remain fully included in school life. |
All |
Total budgeted cost: £149,240
Implementation, Monitoring and Review
Our pupil premium strategy is implemented through a combination of high-quality teaching, targeted academic support and wider strategies. The pupil premium lead works closely with senior leaders, subject leaders and family support worker to ensure that provision is evidence-informed, targeted appropriately and responsive to emerging needs.
Progress towards intended outcomes will be reviewed termly through:
- attainment and progress data
- phonics and reading assessments
- attendance and persistent absence data
- intervention baseline and exit assessments
- pupil voice
- participation in enrichment opportunities
- lesson visits, book scrutiny and curriculum monitoring activities
The impact of funded approaches will be evaluated regularly to determine value for money and effectiveness. Where evidence indicates that strategies are not having the intended impact, provision will be adapted to ensure resources continue to target the barriers faced by disadvantaged pupils.
The pupil premium lead will provide reports to governors on the impact of spending and progress towards intended outcomes. Governors will challenge and support leaders to ensure funding is used effectively and that disadvantaged pupils receive the support required to achieve their potential.
Review Cycle
|
Term |
Review Activity |
|
Autumn |
Review baseline data, attendance, phonics outcomes, attainment and barriers to learning. Confirm spending and intervention groups. |
|
Spring |
Evaluate progress towards intended outcomes, review intervention impact and participation in wider opportunities, and adjust provision where needed. |
|
Summer |
Evaluate overall impact of spending, review attainment and attendance outcomes, identify priorities for the following year and complete the annual pupil premium review. |
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2025 to 2026 academic year.
|
Our pupil premium strategy had a positive impact on many disadvantaged pupils through a combination of high-quality teaching, targeted academic support and wider pastoral provision. Communication and language remained a strength for disadvantaged pupils. By the end of EYFS, 85.4% of disadvantaged pupils achieved age-related expectations in Communication and Language. Targeted support through Talk Boost, vocabulary development and oracy activities contributed positively to pupils’ speaking and listening skills. Monitoring, pupil voice and classroom observations showed increased confidence in communication and participation in learning. Continued focus on explicit vocabulary instruction and oracy will ensure these improvements are sustained across the curriculum
Attendance remained a key priority. Whole-school attendance was 94.5%, in line with national figures. Attendance for disadvantaged pupils improved slightly compared with previous years, although attendance and persistent absence for this group remain areas for continued focus. Attendance of disadvantaged pupils improved from 91.8% to 93.4%; however, it remained below the school target of 94%. Persistent absence reduced from 24% to 18%, demonstrating the positive impact of attendance panels and family support. Reducing persistent absence remains a priority for 2027-28.
Disadvantaged pupils benefited from a wide range of enrichment opportunities, including educational visits, sporting events, clubs and wider curriculum experiences. Financial support ensured that pupils were able to participate fully regardless of circumstance. Participation rates were particularly strong from Year 4 onwards, with increasing engagement in extra-curricular activities, competitions and enrichment experiences. These opportunities contributed positively to pupils’ confidence, engagement and personal development. Increasing participation within EYFS and Key Stage 1 will form the next stage of development. Academic outcomes for disadvantaged pupils were strongest in Key Stage 2. At the end of KS2, disadvantaged pupils achieved 76.5% in reading, 94.1% in writing, 82.4% in mathematics and 77% in SPaG, representing improvements compared with 2024-25, when outcomes were 60% in reading, 65% in writing, 55% in mathematics and 65% in SPaG. Writing outcomes were a particular strength and reflected the impact of high-quality teaching and targeted support. In contrast, Key Stage 1 outcomes remained below school expectations. At the end of KS1, 30% of disadvantaged pupils achieved age-related expectations in reading, writing and mathematics. This cohort included a high proportion of pupils with SEND, with 7 of the 9 disadvantaged pupils also identified as having SEND. While additional interventions were introduced during the year, gaps remained. Raising attainment in Key Stage 1 therefore continues to be a major priority moving forward Whole-school phonics outcomes improved from 64.9% to 72.9%, demonstrating the positive impact of strengthened phonics provision and intervention. Despite this improvement, only 50% of disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standard in the Year 1 Phonics Screening Check, compared with 77.5% of non-disadvantaged pupils, indicating that a significant attainment gap remains. Targeted phonics intervention supported individual pupils to make progress, but improving phonics attainment and narrowing the gap for disadvantaged pupils remains a key focus for the current strategy.
A significant proportion of disadvantaged pupils also presented with SEND and additional vulnerabilities. Targeted interventions, adaptive teaching approaches, pastoral support and external agency involvement helped many pupils make progress from their individual starting points. The Family Support Worker played a significant role in supporting attendance, wellbeing, family engagement and access to external services. While many pupils made positive progress academically, socially and emotionally, the attainment outcomes of disadvantaged pupils with SEND continue to indicate that this group requires sustained and highly personalised support. This remains an important priority within the current strategy.
Overall, the school’s pupil premium strategy had a positive impact during 2025-26. The strongest outcomes were seen in Communication and Language in EYFS, writing and attainment at KS2, and access to enrichment opportunities. Based on these outcomes, the school will continue to prioritise:
|
Externally provided programmes
Please include the names of any non-DfE programmes that you purchased in the previous academic year. This will help the Department for Education identify which ones are popular in England
|
Programme |
Provider |
|
Reading Plus |
Reading Solutions |
|
Spelling and Literacy Shed |
Ed Shed |
|
Grammasaurus |
Grammasaurus |
|
Times Table Rockstars |
Maths Circle |
|
Classroom Secrets |
Classroom secrets |
|
The Thrive Approach |
Frontline Training Solutions Ltd / Thrive |
|
Read Write Inc |
RMT / Ruth Miskin Training |
|
Testbase |
Doublestruck Ltd |
|
White Rose Maths |
White Rose Education |
Pupil premium strategy statement 2025-26
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
|
Detail |
Data |
|
School name |
Windy Nook Primary |
|
Number of pupils in school |
299 |
|
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils |
30% (not including nursery) |
|
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) |
2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 |
|
Date this statement was published |
October 2025 |
|
Date on which it will be reviewed |
September 2026 |
|
Statement authorised by |
Mrs. Lucie Forrest |
|
Pupil premium lead |
Mrs. Jemma Traynor |
|
Governor / Trustee lead |
Mrs. Lynne Coulson |
Funding overview
|
Detail |
Amount |
|
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year |
£173,940 |
|
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year |
£0 |
|
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) |
£0 |
|
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year |
£173,940 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
|
Overcoming barriers to learning is at the heart of our Pupil Premium Grant use. We understand that needs and costs will differ depending on the barriers to learning being addressed. As such, we do not automatically allocate personal budgets per student in receipt of the Pupil Premium Grant. Instead, we identify the barrier to be addressed, and the interventions required, whether in small groups, large groups, the whole school or as individuals, and allocate a budget accordingly. Our aim is to accelerate progress, moving pupils to at least age related expectations. We aim to provide all pupils with the opportunity to achieve their potential, including those who are already high attainers. Non disadvantaged pupils’ attainment will be sustained and improved alongside progress for their disadvantaged peers. Alongside academic support, we will ensure that those pupils who have social, emotional and mental health needs will access high quality provision from appropriately trained adults. Our Priorities for 2025-26 · Attendance – reducing gap between PP and non-PP. Reducing PA rates of PP pupils · Phonics – closing the gap between PP and non-PP for phonics and reading in KS1 · Maths – closing the gap between PP and non-PP for maths in KS1 · Supporting well-being of PP pupils and support for parents in accessing relevant support services · EAL support – language acquisition
|
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
|
Challenge number |
Detail of challenge |
|
1 |
Assessments, observations, and discussions with pupils indicate underdeveloped oral language skills and vocabulary gaps among many disadvantaged pupils on entry into the EYFS. Disadvantaged pupils often face significant barriers in developing spoken language skills, which are foundational to academic success and lifelong learning. Evidence shows that oracy is a powerful lever for equity, particularly for Pupil Premium students who may have limited opportunities to develop these skills outside of school.
|
|
2 |
Our attendance data over the past 3 years indicates that attendance among disadvantaged pupils has been between 2 – 4% lower than for non-disadvantaged pupils. Our PA data for the past 3 years indicates that rates of PA have increased for our PP pupils. Our assessments and observations indicate that absenteeism is negatively impacting our disadvantaged pupils’ progress. |
|
3 |
Our observations indicate that the majority of disadvantaged pupils continue to have limited enrichment opportunities which in turn affects attainment. |
|
4 |
Gaps in Key Stage 1 can be linked to limited parental support, especially among Pupil Premium pupils. This can result in poor homework completion, minimal reading at home, and weak early literacy skills. Without consistent reinforcement outside school, these children struggle to build the foundations needed for successful learning, widening the attainment gap from an early age. |
|
5 |
Through observations and discussions with pupils, many PP pupils, have difficulty retaining and remembering taught knowledge and skills away from the point of teaching. |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
|
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
|
Children across school to catch up with their peers in relation to attainment in Communication and Language. |
By the end of the EYFS, more PP children will reach age-appropriate levels in Communication and Language. Children across school will have improved oracy skills. Improved spoken language skills, confidence, and classroom engagement for Pupil Premium pupils. Accelerated progress in reading and maths. Enhanced teacher capacity to deliver inclusive, high-quality oracy instruction |
|
The gap in attendance between PP pupils and non-PP pupils will have reduced. |
Less PP pupils will be on the persistent absenteeism list More PP pupils will reach the national expected level for attendance |
|
All children will have the same opportunity to experience a wide range of extra-curricular activities Pupils will be provided with experiences outside of their normal range which will promote understanding of the wider world, build aspirations, promote confidence and self- esteem. |
PP children will attend after school and before school activities Cultural capital is enhanced by experiences and visits, both virtually and in school, which build on skills and knowledge from curriculum subjects taught in class. The offer is monitored across school |
|
All children will receive high quality teaching and learning through quality first teach and targeted interventions |
Lessen the GAP in attainment between PP and non-PP pupils across maths and English in KS1. The aim over time, is that children will leave KS1 and LKS2 with fluency in calculation and a confidence and flexibility with number. The aim over time, is that children will leave KS1 and LKS2 with fluency in reading. Attention will be given to key knowledge and understanding needed to support success in the future. |
|
An improved knowledge of cognitive science will enable teachers to support the learning. This will include retrieval practice, questioning skills, metacognition, critical thinking, and self-regulation |
Observations will show pupils’ cognitive load will be managed and strategies are in use to strengthen memory of key concepts in all subjects including retrieval practice. PP pupils will be involved in subject lead pupil voice meetings. |
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £91,578
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
All staff to be trained in the principles of Rosenshine’s theory and implement them in their practice
Headteacher and Assistant Headteacher on training for Belong Project – Trauma Informed theory. Staff to be trained. |
Rosenshine’s principle emphasizes the importance of giving students sufficient time to practise retrieval, ask questions, and get the desired help. Cognitive Psychology Research reveals that the instructors who utilised the most effective teaching strategies had more students with higher educational success rates Cognitive science principles of learning can have a real impact on rates of learning in the classroom. There is value in teachers having working knowledge of cognitive science principles. (Aug 2021 EEF) EEF guidance highlights that building a culture of belonging—where pupils feel seen, understood, and safe—is essential for improving attendance and engagement, particularly among disadvantaged learners |
3, 4, 5 |
|
RWInc ongoing support for all staff to update knowledge and understanding of phonics |
Read Write Inc (RWInc) is a DfE validated Systematic Synthetic Phonics programme Phonics approaches have a strong evidence base that indicates a positive impact on the accuracy of word reading (though not necessarily comprehension), particularly for disadvantaged pupils: Phonics | Toolkit Strand | Education Endowment Foundation | EEF EEF trials have shown how, when properly trained and supported, teaching assistants working in structured ways with small groups can boost pupils’ progress. |
4 |
|
Writing training from LA for teachers. share good practice through peer mentoring
Staff training on Voice 21 (Oracy training) . |
High quality teaching improves pupil outcomes, and effective professional development offers a crucial tool to develop teaching quality and enhance children’s outcomes in the classroom. EEF Mentoring and coaching can be an important source of support, particularly for early career teachers. EEF Voice 21 provides a structured, evidence-informed approach to embedding oracy across the curriculum. It aligns with the Education Endowment Foundation’s (EEF) guidance on oral language interventions, which demonstrate an average of +5 months’ progress for disadvantaged pupils at low cost. |
4, 5
1 |
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £35,362
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
EYFS staff deliver Talk Boost
Staff in KS1 and KS2 will focus on vocabulary development across all subjects
Staff in KS1 and KS2 will focus on speaking and listening skills and vocabulary development for EAL pupils |
There is a strong evidence base that suggests oral language interventions, including dialogic activities such as high-quality classroom discussion, are inexpensive to implement with high impacts on reading: Oral language interventions | Toolkit Strand | Education Endowment Foundation | EEF EEF Toolkit – Small group tuition has an average impact of four months’ additional progress over the course of a year. EEF trials have shown how, when properly trained and supported, teaching assistants working in structured ways with small groups can boost pupils’ progress. |
1 |
|
Reading and phonics interventions across school targeted at PP pupils
|
EEF Toolkit – On average, oral language approaches have a high impact on pupil outcomes of 6 months’ additional progress. These have a positive impact on reading progress. EEF Toolkit – Small group tuition has an average impact of four months’ additional progress over the course of a year. EEF Toolkit – Reading comprehension strategies are high impact on average (+6 months). Alongside phonics it is a crucial component of early reading instruction. Read Write Inc (RWInc) is a DfE validated Systematic Synthetic Phonics programme Phonics approaches have a strong evidence base that indicates a positive impact on the accuracy of word reading (though not necessarily comprehension), particularly for disadvantaged pupils: Phonics | Toolkit Strand | Education Endowment Foundation | EEF |
4, 5 |
|
Maths interventions delivered across school Mastering number embedded in EYFS and KS1. Mastering Number introduced in Key Stage Two. Staff across school are involved in Maths Lead Programme working with the Great North Maths Hub. A member of the SLT has the Maths Specialist Role.
|
This is a DfE funded programme that aims to secure firm foundations in the development of good number sense for all children. In EY/KS1/KS2, the focus is additive reasoning.
EEF Toolkit – Small group tuition has an average impact of four months’ additional progress over the course of a year. Small group tuition is most likely to be effective if it is targeted at pupils’ specific needs. Diagnostic assessment can be used to assess the best way to target support.
Evidence from NCETM and Maths Hubs shows that Mastering Number improves fluency, confidence, and reasoning, especially for disadvantaged pupils. EEF research supports early numeracy interventions as high-impact strategies for closing the attainment gap.
|
4, 5 |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £16,000
|
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
|
Attendance – Sharing a part-time home school liaison officer with a local school to support families with attendance and acute needs via TAF and CAF |
DfE report on attendance (Working together to improve School attendance May 2022) and attainment showed strong link between attendance and attainment. Pupils with 100% attendance 4.7 times more likely to achieve than those with 85%. |
2 |
|
Support accessing trips, after school activities etc to ensure all pupils receive equal access |
Ofsted 2013 report – The full range of educational experiences – support is given to ensure that all pupils have full access to broad educational experiences, such as residential courses, competing in sporting events, subsidised music lessons, subsidised uniform, Due to financial pressures, some of our pupils have had limited experiences outside the home. Evidence shows that these are vital areas of expenditure for children as it raises aspirations, improves cultural capital, improves children’s knowledge of the wider world and has a significant impact on pupils’ academic understanding. |
3 |
|
Contingency fund for acute issues. |
Based on our experiences and those of similar schools to ours, we have identified a need to set a small amount of funding aside to respond quickly to needs that have not yet been identified. |
All |
Total budgeted cost: £173,940
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2024 to 2025 academic year.
|
Analysis of assessment data for the end of the academic year 2024-2025, shows that by the end of EYFS, 85.4% of PP pupils achieved ARE in Communication and Language and 75% in PSED, 40% of PP pupils passed the Y1 Phonics screen which is significantly less than the previous year but results are cohort specific, 29% of PP pupils achieved ARE in reading, 29% in writing and 28% in maths at the end of KS1. 60% of PP pupils achieved ARE in reading, 65% in Spag and, 55% maths at the end of KS2 and 65 % in writing. In Key Stage 2 more PP pupils achieved ARE in writing than the previous year showing the positive impact of our interventions and the structure and quality first teaching of our writing units, which will continue this next academic year. Although gaps remain between the attainment of PP pupils and other pupils, due to the targeted interventions and quality first teaching these gaps are beginning to reduce in certain cohorts. We will continue with many aspects of our strategy this academic year. Our overall school attendance (94.8%) in 2024-25 which is in line with national. Absence among disadvantaged pupils was higher than non-disadvantaged pupils and is higher than national for pupil premium children. These gaps have reduced slightly from last year and the previous year however attendance continues to be a focus of our current plan. Although our persistent absentee rate is higher for disadvantage than non-disadvantage pupils we are in the top 30-40% of schools nationally. The gap between PP and non-PP pupils in maths is closing in many year groups especially in KS2. With the introduction of mastering number KS2 for 25-26 we will be able to target and support the children from KS1 moving up to KS2. Interventions will continue to support those children in Year 1 and 2 where less than 50% of PP were at ARE. Extra support had been put in place for our Key Stage One children including buddy systems and playtime support mainly for those children that came from other schools at the start of the academic year. Extra support was given in Maths and English as there were significant gaps which impacted on the overall results for those cohorts. The gaps were too wide to narrow within the time frame so strategies and support will continue to be an area to develop in the next academic year. The continued employment of the family support worker has proven to be a valuable aspect of our pupil premium strategy and will remain in place for the next academic year. Their work has been instrumental in supporting families, particularly those facing financial and social challenges. Citizens Advice has been invited into school to offer tailored guidance, and regular food boxes have been distributed to families in need. The school has also strengthened its partnership with Feeding Families, ensuring consistent access to essential supplies. Our SENDCO has enhanced parental engagement by using the school website to signpost families to relevant charities and support services. Additionally, targeted assistance was provided to help families access holiday clubs over the summer, promoting enrichment opportunities for pupils. Overall, the family support worker has played a key role in building trust with parents and improving outcomes for disadvantaged pupils. The pupil premium strategy for EAL children has delivered strong outcomes, especially in Year 6, with all three pupils achieving success in their Key Stage 2 SATs. This progress is largely due to the consistent and targeted support provided by school staff. Class teachers and teaching assistants delivered regular 1:1 intervention focused on language development, reading comprehension, and writing skills, tailored to each child’s needs. Staff also worked closely with EMTAS and families to build strong home-school links, ensuring pupils felt supported both academically and emotionally. Given the impact of this approach, the strategy will continue into the next academic year, with a focus on early identification, personalised support, and ongoing staff development to meet the evolving needs of EAL learners. |
Externally provided programmes
Please include the names of any non-DfE programmes that you purchased in the previous academic year. This will help the Department for Education identify which ones are popular in England
|
Programme |
Provider |
|
Reading Plus |
Reading Solutions |
|
Spelling and Literacy Shed |
Ed Shed |
|
Conquer Maths |
Conquer Maths |
|
Times Table Rockstars |
Maths Circle |
|
Classroom Secrets |
Classroom secrets |
More Information
Statements on the Use of Pupil Premium Monies
Archives
Pupil Premium Strategy 2026-27
Pupil Premium Strategy 2025-26
Pupil Premium Strategy 2024-2025
Pupil Premium Strategy 2024-2025 PDF
Pupil Premium Strategy 2023-2024 docx
Pupil Premium Strategy 2023-2024
Pupil Premium Strategy 2022-2023

